<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:issuu="http://www.issuu.com/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0" issuu:id="6fc1f40c-a3aa-4125-999f-513bdf6ef257" issuu:type="folder"><channel><title>Natural and Sexual Selection</title><description>An Open Letter about Natural and Sexual Selection</description><link>http://issuu.com</link><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:57:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://feed.issuu.com/folder/6fc1f40c-a3aa-4125-999f-513bdf6ef257/rss20.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="username" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="folderId" value="6fc1f40c-a3aa-4125-999f-513bdf6ef257"/><issuu:field name="items" value="12"/></issuu:fields><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/phenotypic_differences_in_genetically_identical_or/1</guid><title>Phenotypic differences in genetically identicalorganisms: the epigenetic perspective</title><description>Human monozygotic twins and other genetically identical organisms are almost always strikingly similar in appearance, yet they are often discordant for important phenotypes including complex diseases.</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/phenotypic_differences_in_genetically_identical_or/1</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:57:24 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/phenotypic_differences_in_genetically_identical_or"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/130115125437-5a63188dab5a439695765f7da1f6e4c2/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Phenotypic differences in genetically identicalorganisms: the epigenetic perspective&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/130115125437-5a63188dab5a439695765f7da1f6e4c2/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/130115125437-5a63188dab5a439695765f7da1f6e4c2/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="Phenotypic differences in genetically identicalorganisms: the epigenetic perspective"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="130115125437-5a63188dab5a439695765f7da1f6e4c2"/><issuu:field name="name" value="phenotypic_differences_in_genetically_identical_or"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="Human monozygotic twins and other genetically identical organisms are almost always strikingly similar in appearance, yet they are often discordant for important phenotypes including complex diseases."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2013-01-15T12:57:24.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sexual_contacts/1</guid><title>The web of human sexual contacts</title><description>Promiscuous individuals are the vulnerable nodes to target in safe-sex campaigns.</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sexual_contacts/1</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 21:25:49 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sexual_contacts"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/110525212441-fe33b0c65ac7488d841877194e741542/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;The web of human sexual contacts&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/110525212441-fe33b0c65ac7488d841877194e741542/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/110525212441-fe33b0c65ac7488d841877194e741542/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="The web of human sexual contacts"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="110525212441-fe33b0c65ac7488d841877194e741542"/><issuu:field name="name" value="sexual_contacts"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="Promiscuous individuals are the vulnerable nodes to target in safe-sex campaigns."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2011-05-25T21:25:49.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/are_eukaryotic_microorganisms_clonal_or_sexual/1</guid><title>Are eukaryotic microorganisms clonal or sexual? A populationgenetics vantage</title><description>We argue that the mode of reproduction of
microorganisms in nature can only be decided by population genetic information. The evidence available indicates that many parasitic protozoa and unicellular fungi have clonal rather than sexual population structures, which has major consequences for medical research and practice. Plasmodium falciparum, the agent of malaria, is a special case: the scarce evidence available is contradictory, some suggesting that uniparental lineages may exist in nature. This is puzzling (because P. falciparum is known to have a sexual stage) and poses a challenge that can be readily settled by ascertaining the frequency distribution of genotypes in natural populations.</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/are_eukaryotic_microorganisms_clonal_or_sexual/1</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:31:27 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/are_eukaryotic_microorganisms_clonal_or_sexual"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/101218182530-cd7116c577fc4be4bbe62841ae73fbc4/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Are eukaryotic microorganisms clonal or sexual? A populationgenetics vantage&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/101218182530-cd7116c577fc4be4bbe62841ae73fbc4/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/101218182530-cd7116c577fc4be4bbe62841ae73fbc4/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="Are eukaryotic microorganisms clonal or sexual? A populationgenetics vantage"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="101218182530-cd7116c577fc4be4bbe62841ae73fbc4"/><issuu:field name="name" value="are_eukaryotic_microorganisms_clonal_or_sexual"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="We argue that the mode of reproduction of
microorganisms in nature can only be decided by population genetic information. The evidence available indicates that many parasitic protozoa and unicellular fungi have clonal rather than sexual population structures, which has major consequences for medical research and practice. Plasmodium falciparum, the agent of malaria, is a special case: the scarce evidence available is contradictory, some suggesting that uniparental lineages may exist in nature. This is puzzling (because P. falciparum is known to have a sexual stage) and poses a challenge that can be readily settled by ascertaining the frequency distribution of genotypes in natural populations."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2010-12-18T18:31:27.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sex_will_be_the_first_stratigraphic_occurrence_of_/1</guid><title>Bangiomorpha pubescens</title><description>Implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity, and the Mesoproterozoic/Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes.
Sex will be the first stratigraphic occurrence of complex multicellularity!</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sex_will_be_the_first_stratigraphic_occurrence_of_/1</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:56:52 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sex_will_be_the_first_stratigraphic_occurrence_of_"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/101218180123-d19df7a331414209b7c25febbf6a108d/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Bangiomorpha pubescens&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/101218180123-d19df7a331414209b7c25febbf6a108d/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/101218180123-d19df7a331414209b7c25febbf6a108d/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="Bangiomorpha pubescens"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="101218180123-d19df7a331414209b7c25febbf6a108d"/><issuu:field name="name" value="sex_will_be_the_first_stratigraphic_occurrence_of_"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="Implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity, and the Mesoproterozoic/Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes.
Sex will be the first stratigraphic occurrence of complex multicellularity!"/><issuu:field name="created" value="2010-12-18T17:56:52.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/ring_species_another_illusionist_trick/1</guid><title>Ring Species another Illusionist Trick</title><description>We are accustomed to arguments from Creationists, and some of those arguments are in my opinion really valid, like the Cambrian Explosion argument. However Evolutionists are some times deluded by them self, and that is a shame.</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/ring_species_another_illusionist_trick/1</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:12:57 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/ring_species_another_illusionist_trick"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/101123101051-c6866850e40a4a23abe48d14a6d44cda/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Ring Species another Illusionist Trick&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/101123101051-c6866850e40a4a23abe48d14a6d44cda/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/101123101051-c6866850e40a4a23abe48d14a6d44cda/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="Ring Species another Illusionist Trick"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="101123101051-c6866850e40a4a23abe48d14a6d44cda"/><issuu:field name="name" value="ring_species_another_illusionist_trick"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="We are accustomed to arguments from Creationists, and some of those arguments are in my opinion really valid, like the Cambrian Explosion argument. However Evolutionists are some times deluded by them self, and that is a shame."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2010-11-23T10:12:57.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/the_truth_about_species/1</guid><title>The Truth about Species!</title><description>The Truth about Species! - Why Sex, Cambrian Mystery, Inductive Nature, Entropic Nature.</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/the_truth_about_species/1</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:11:07 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/the_truth_about_species"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/101204151813-8742429784654b58b542b0dc96253d15/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;The Truth about Species!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/101204151813-8742429784654b58b542b0dc96253d15/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/101204151813-8742429784654b58b542b0dc96253d15/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="The Truth about Species!"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="101204151813-8742429784654b58b542b0dc96253d15"/><issuu:field name="name" value="the_truth_about_species"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="The Truth about Species! - Why Sex, Cambrian Mystery, Inductive Nature, Entropic Nature."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2010-11-23T10:11:07.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sex_reduces_genetic_variation/1</guid><title>Sex reduces genetic variation: a multidisciplinary review</title><description>For over a century, the paradigm has been that sex invariably increases genetic variation, despite many renowned biologists asserting that sex decreases most genetic variation. Sex is usually perceived as the source of additive genetic variance that drives eukaryotic evolution vis-à-vis adaptation and Fisher's fundamental theorem. However, evidence for sex decreasing genetic variation appears in ecology, paleontology, population genetics, and cancer biology. The common thread among many of these disciplines is that sex acts like a coarse filter, weeding out major changes, such as chromosomal rearrangements (that are almost always deleterious), but letting minor variation, such as changes at the nucleotide or gene level (that are often neutral), flow through the sexual sieve.</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sex_reduces_genetic_variation/1</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sex_reduces_genetic_variation"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/110117012238-19caf13455f34e4494f692c4a29443c4/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Sex reduces genetic variation: a multidisciplinary review&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/110117012238-19caf13455f34e4494f692c4a29443c4/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/110117012238-19caf13455f34e4494f692c4a29443c4/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="Sex reduces genetic variation: a multidisciplinary review"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="110117012238-19caf13455f34e4494f692c4a29443c4"/><issuu:field name="name" value="sex_reduces_genetic_variation"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="For over a century, the paradigm has been that sex invariably increases genetic variation, despite many renowned biologists asserting that sex decreases most genetic variation. Sex is usually perceived as the source of additive genetic variance that drives eukaryotic evolution vis-à-vis adaptation and Fisher's fundamental theorem. However, evidence for sex decreasing genetic variation appears in ecology, paleontology, population genetics, and cancer biology. The common thread among many of these disciplines is that sex acts like a coarse filter, weeding out major changes, such as chromosomal rearrangements (that are almost always deleterious), but letting minor variation, such as changes at the nucleotide or gene level (that are often neutral), flow through the sexual sieve."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2010-11-20T00:00:00.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/relationshipagetrisomy21/1</guid><title>The Relationship between Maternal Age and Chromosome Size in Autosomal Trisomy</title><description>The pattern of maternal age-specific incidence of autosomal trisomy in spontaneous abortions was examined for each chromosome for which a sufficient number of trisomies was observed. This included chromosomes 2, 4, 7-10, 13-16, 18, and 20-22.  The results suggest that autosomal trisomies may be of heterogeneous origin, with a maternal age-related factor associated with chromosome size and other sources unrelated to chromosome size. Additional evidence for and against this hypothesis is discussed.</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/relationshipagetrisomy21/1</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:00:13 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/relationshipagetrisomy21"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/101031195824-fcee89467ae74f76ae3f79cee95873b4/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;The Relationship between Maternal Age and Chromosome Size in Autosomal Trisomy&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/101031195824-fcee89467ae74f76ae3f79cee95873b4/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/101031195824-fcee89467ae74f76ae3f79cee95873b4/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="The Relationship between Maternal Age and Chromosome Size in Autosomal Trisomy"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="101031195824-fcee89467ae74f76ae3f79cee95873b4"/><issuu:field name="name" value="relationshipagetrisomy21"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="The pattern of maternal age-specific incidence of autosomal trisomy in spontaneous abortions was examined for each chromosome for which a sufficient number of trisomies was observed. This included chromosomes 2, 4, 7-10, 13-16, 18, and 20-22.  The results suggest that autosomal trisomies may be of heterogeneous origin, with a maternal age-related factor associated with chromosome size and other sources unrelated to chromosome size. Additional evidence for and against this hypothesis is discussed."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2010-10-31T20:00:13.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sexual_selection/1</guid><title>An Open Letter about Natural and Sexual Selection</title><description>An essay that tries to demonstrate that Sexual Selection it's a process of induction similar in physics, working as a solution to entropy in reproduction. Sexual selection, not natural selection, as the main factor of the intelligent design delusion.</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sexual_selection/1</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/sexual_selection"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/101001120119-6802967a87e04ea481c96b11392e2bca/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;An Open Letter about Natural and Sexual Selection&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/101001120119-6802967a87e04ea481c96b11392e2bca/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/101001120119-6802967a87e04ea481c96b11392e2bca/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="An Open Letter about Natural and Sexual Selection"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="101001120119-6802967a87e04ea481c96b11392e2bca"/><issuu:field name="name" value="sexual_selection"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="An essay that tries to demonstrate that Sexual Selection it's a process of induction similar in physics, working as a solution to entropy in reproduction. Sexual selection, not natural selection, as the main factor of the intelligent design delusion."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2010-07-29T00:00:00.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/1704/1</guid><title>On the Origin of Species by Natural and Sexual Selection</title><description>Ecological speciation is considered an adaptive response to selection for local adaptation. However, besides suitable ecological conditions, the process requires assortative mating to protect the nascent species from homogenization by gene flow. By means of a simple model, we demonstrate that disruptive ecological selection favors the evolution of sexual preferences for ornaments that signal local adaptation. Such preferences induce assortative mating with respect to ecological characters and enhance the strength of disruptive selection. Natural and sexual selection thus work in concert to achieve local adaptation and reproductive isolation, even in the presence of substantial gene flow. The resulting speciation process ensues without the divergence of mating preferences, avoiding problems that have plagued previous models of speciation by sexual selection.</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/1704/1</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/1704"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/101001122238-7bd21d1c7a1e4829bb6555453bcc6c88/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;On the Origin of Species by Natural and Sexual Selection&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/101001122238-7bd21d1c7a1e4829bb6555453bcc6c88/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/101001122238-7bd21d1c7a1e4829bb6555453bcc6c88/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="On the Origin of Species by Natural and Sexual Selection"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="101001122238-7bd21d1c7a1e4829bb6555453bcc6c88"/><issuu:field name="name" value="1704"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="Ecological speciation is considered an adaptive response to selection for local adaptation. However, besides suitable ecological conditions, the process requires assortative mating to protect the nascent species from homogenization by gene flow. By means of a simple model, we demonstrate that disruptive ecological selection favors the evolution of sexual preferences for ornaments that signal local adaptation. Such preferences induce assortative mating with respect to ecological characters and enhance the strength of disruptive selection. Natural and sexual selection thus work in concert to achieve local adaptation and reproductive isolation, even in the presence of substantial gene flow. The resulting speciation process ensues without the divergence of mating preferences, avoiding problems that have plagued previous models of speciation by sexual selection."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2009-12-18T00:00:00.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/1308/1</guid><title>Extremely High Mutation Rate of a Hammerhead Viroid</title><description>Mutation rates vary by orders of magnitude across species (1, 2), with the highest rates measured so far corresponding to RNAviruses (3), but little is known about other RNA replicons. Viroids are plant pathogens with minimal nonprotein-coding RNA genomes replicated by host RNA polymerases (4).</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/1308/1</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/1308"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/101001121731-10d51df6f40b465dac5df4f55f3fad0a/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Extremely High Mutation Rate of a Hammerhead Viroid&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/101001121731-10d51df6f40b465dac5df4f55f3fad0a/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/101001121731-10d51df6f40b465dac5df4f55f3fad0a/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="Extremely High Mutation Rate of a Hammerhead Viroid"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="101001121731-10d51df6f40b465dac5df4f55f3fad0a"/><issuu:field name="name" value="1308"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="Mutation rates vary by orders of magnitude across species (1, 2), with the highest rates measured so far corresponding to RNAviruses (3), but little is known about other RNA replicons. Viroids are plant pathogens with minimal nonprotein-coding RNA genomes replicated by host RNA polymerases (4)."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2009-03-06T00:00:00.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item><item><guid>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/820/1</guid><title>Evolution of mutation rates in bacteria</title><description>Evolutionary success of bacteria relies on the constant fine-tuning of their mutation rates, which optimizes their adaptability to constantly changing environmental conditions. When adaptation is limited by the mutation supply rate, under some conditions, natural selection favours increased mutation rates by acting on allelic variation of the genetic systems that control fidelity of DNA replication and repair. Mutator alleles are carried to high frequency through hitchhiking with the adaptive mutations they generate. However, when fitness gain no longer counterbalances the fitness loss due to continuous generation of deleterious mutations, natural selection favours reduction of mutation rates. Selection and counterselection of high mutation rates depends on many factors: the number of mutations required for adaptation, the strength of mutator alleles, bacterial population size, competition with other strains, migration, and spatial and temporal environmental heterogeneity.</description><link>http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/820/1</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr valign="top"&gt;&lt;td width="65"&gt;&lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas/docs/820"&gt;&lt;img src="http://image.issuu.com/101001122643-26acebc21b3b4266b0d84182bd704a41/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg" width="55" border="0"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://content.issuu.com/icons/label_bookmark.png" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Evolution of mutation rates in bacteria&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bookmarked by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Created by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://issuu.com/ruiseixas"&gt;ruiseixas&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="http://image.issuu.com/101001122643-26acebc21b3b4266b0d84182bd704a41/jpg/page_1_thumb_large.jpg"/><media:thumbnail url="http://image.issuu.com/101001122643-26acebc21b3b4266b0d84182bd704a41/jpg/page_1_thumb_medium.jpg"/><issuu:page number="1"/><issuu:fields><issuu:field name="title" value="Evolution of mutation rates in bacteria"/><issuu:field name="type" value="bookmark"/><issuu:field name="documentId" value="101001122643-26acebc21b3b4266b0d84182bd704a41"/><issuu:field name="name" value="820"/><issuu:field name="user" value="ruiseixas"/><issuu:field name="description" value="Evolutionary success of bacteria relies on the constant fine-tuning of their mutation rates, which optimizes their adaptability to constantly changing environmental conditions. When adaptation is limited by the mutation supply rate, under some conditions, natural selection favours increased mutation rates by acting on allelic variation of the genetic systems that control fidelity of DNA replication and repair. Mutator alleles are carried to high frequency through hitchhiking with the adaptive mutations they generate. However, when fitness gain no longer counterbalances the fitness loss due to continuous generation of deleterious mutations, natural selection favours reduction of mutation rates. Selection and counterselection of high mutation rates depends on many factors: the number of mutations required for adaptation, the strength of mutator alleles, bacterial population size, competition with other strains, migration, and spatial and temporal environmental heterogeneity."/><issuu:field name="created" value="2006-03-24T00:00:00.000Z"/></issuu:fields></item></channel></rss>